Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN versus PRESIDENT OF CANTONMENT BOARD CUM APPELLATE AUTHORITY

Selection of cantonment board grounds for rejection of nomination papers of section 15B (2) of the Cantonment Act 1924 The applicant's nomination was rejected on the basis that during this period he became a member of the cantonment board, And benefited his family members as he wished to be elected to the Cantonment Board. Only then can he be disqualified, if he is contracting for work or providing goods to the board or has any interest in his affairs, besides the bungalow in the Cantonment Board Colony in which he The lease was occupied, was not. If it was for the purpose of drawing himself economic benefits to seize another property, however, he was not liable for the beneficial benefits of the members of the family, the applicant only pursuant to Section 15B (2), The cantonment act could have been disqualified on any basis. , 1924, but his papers were outside the jurisdiction of Section 15B (2) of the Act for the rejection of the nomination The tuner papers could not maintain the law because the nomination was outside the scope of legal provision. jobs for fresh advocates from Layyah lawyer