MUHAMMAD JOBAL versus CH. GHULAM SARWAR, JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 99 Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Sections 5 (3) and 4 (1) = Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/307/148/149 Additional Sessions Judge After the suit, he began to file a case with his trial and he partially entered evidence when the Judge Special Court moved the case to his file and filed terrorism at the complainant's request. Admitted under Section 5 () of the Act. The Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975 was not held, nor was the Judge's Special Court given any jurisdiction to transfer cases from ordinary criminal courts to his own file, nor did he act ( May take notice of this matter under section 5) (3). XV of 1975) Even otherwise, the aforesaid transfer order had to be reversed on the score that was contrary to the principles of natural justice. According to the provisions of subsection (1) of section 4 of the Act, the special court also dismissed the judge's special court order transferring the case in its file without legality and illegal. There is no legal effect which, according to its instructions, may be returned to the Additional Sessions Judge in order to make a decision in accordance with this law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
