Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

F.W. WOOLWORTH CO., U.S.A. versus ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, KARACHI


Trademarks Act 1940 Section 6 (1) (d) Trademark Application for registration of Woolco Trademark registration was requested for lace, embroidery, ribbon and clothing and footwear etc. The Registrar applied this trade mark. He rejected it. Since the Registrar of the Act was defamatory against the provisions of Section 6 (1) (d) of the Trademarks because it was of the opinion that Volkow was a direct reference and the quality of the goods for which the application was made, Volkow requested Applied by the applicant, a new set of words and although there is some suggestive reference to the role of the goods for which he was asked to register, but such reference was not direct, Therefore, it would not violate the provisions of section 6 (1) (d) of the Act.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Barbar Loi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.