Find a Lawyer

ZIAUL KHALIQUE versus SHIRIN SIDDIQ

Section 53 of the Property Act 1882 is one of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 22 of the Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 of the Commonwealth of Commonwealths that is sued under the contract for the specific performance of the sale contract. The trial court had given the case. The discretion to grant or not to grant certain performance relief, however, should not be arbitrary but should be guided by appropriate or appropriate judicial principles, which the Court of Appeal is able to correct by the plaintiff disputing with its co-buyer, Therefore, he sued his own plaintiff for the specific performance of the contract, in which case he failed to mention that he was ready and willing to pay his share of the contract and consequently no such The matter was not settled in the suit, which is the fact that the plaintiff also had to prove. The witness did not appear in the courtroom to claim and prove that he was ready and willing to pay his share of the contract, the trial court was directed by the trial court to submit a b. Alliance was considered for sale but failed to do so. Both buyers failed to pay their share of the contract; they had no liability in their favor. ? law firms from Sangla Hill lawyer