TRAVELAGENTS ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN versus SKYLINE (PVT.) TRAVELS,LTD.
Rule Order XXXVIII, Annexure OXXXVIII Prior to the arrest of CPC and prior to the R5 decision, the attachment request before the judgment could not be lightly ordered before the court itself. Had to be satisfied that the defendants (caveat was about the country or its settlement) were disappointed or delayed in implementing the property which could be granted against it, however, such satisfaction Can also be reduced by affidavits and the matters surrounding it, while the court can also agree that the defendant's intention to disappoint, even if satisfied. Are planning to leave the country. Or delay the execution of any order passed against them, instructing them to submit a certain amount of security within a month's time, failing which their assets and office premises and passports Attachments will be issued in advance of the decision against the defendants regarding the establishment. Other defendants will be dropped
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
