Professional Practices and Etiquette Sections 55 and 56, IV, paras: and the 8 Advocates, who had earlier dismissed the plea of guilty as a High Court Judge, against High's sentence by the Sessions Court. A criminal appeal was filed in the High Court. The complainant's stand was that the aforementioned advocate was banned from defending the above-mentioned accused under Articles 7 and 8, Chapter IV - General Practices of the Commonwealth - Professional Practices and Etiquette According to the assembly, it has been said that the lawyer has been dismissed by another lawyer. Until now, the accused whose bail application was decided by him was from the Advocate but was not found to be competent to represent the other accused in the appeal, in which case he had previously acted in judicial capacity. Did not, the High Court could not exclude the said Advocate. Representing them on the merits of the case in which they may have acted in judicial capacity for the Bar Council was an authorized forum and not a High Core. In such cases, the complainant's request for enforcement of his decision to uphold professional conduct and etiquette was disqualified and rejected by merit
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
