WAJIDA BEGUM versus ANWARUL HAQ
The Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 2 (f) (c) claims in connection with the landlord and tenant-proof appellant that he had gifted her husband on the occasion of his marriage with her. The woman, who established her title in relation to the premises in question, did not read anywhere that her premises had already been gifted or her possession had been handed over to her. On the contrary, it appeared that she would be gifted to her premises when the agreed upon marriage took place when the appellant could not disclose the date of her marriage to the owner of the original premises, which is evidently the execution of the alleged document. Was the date after The contents of the document were admittedly contradictory and contrary to which the evidence was alleged by the appellant in his statement. She alleged that her husband had already gifted the underground places on the occasion of her wedding and had handed her over. Physical possession of this property
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer