MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN versus THE STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (XLV of 1860), validation of section 161 defense was not challenged because there was sufficient evidence on record to link the accused to a commission of the crime. Admitted after the raid. After receiving the bribe money, the offender was convicted and consequently the accused was given a one year RI, however, he was sentenced to a fine of Rs 10,000 as he was not only employed. Had suffered, but had suffered for a long time. Trial
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Sanjwal lawyer
