Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

INAYAT ALI versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 526 Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 4 Sanctions (XLV of 1860), Section 307/324/148/149 Case Transfer Case Pending. The magistrate had made no charge of any of the Kalashnikovs or other weapons mentioned in the schedule contained in Act XV of 1975, therefore, neither possibly nor legally could it be directed to go to trial by a special court. By giving this jurisdiction to the special court by which the law was not invested, the High Court had no jurisdiction to order the transfer of the case from the jurisdictional court to the special court, pursuant to section 262626, Cr. The court was not considered by the provisions of The PC transfer request was considered incorrect and accordingly was dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Layyah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.