STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN versus PERFECT ENTERPRISES ,
The accused accused of defining Section AA / (83 (1C) evidence) did not hide the information sought by the State Bank and sent a partnership agreement with the bank account statement to cooperate with the authorized officers of the bank. The complainant's lawyer was asked to examine the original record if the required accused, as such, was required by the provisions of section A43A of the Ordinance of the Banking Companies. Had not been violated, then, 1962 accused were acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Warah lawyer
