STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN versus UNI PACKS (PVT.) LTD.
In defining section 27A / 83 (1D) evidence of the Ordinance of Banking Companies 1962, it was alleged that the company was accused of depositing money through advertisement, it was alleged that He was also the director of the company at the time, so it was alleged. , Is responsible for the violation of section 27A and was convicted under Section 38 (1D) of the Ordinance 1962 of the Banking Companies, and fined Rs 5,000 or earlier for imprisonment in section 1 of a month. Was sentenced to pay by default.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Chashma lawyer
