Find a Lawyer

SALEHON versus SARDARA

Second Appeal to the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Declaration Against the discovery of fact, the trial of both courts, without any false reading and reading of evidence, consistently and simultaneously found that the defendants / appellants Was in control of Houses in the Jamabandi rental column indicating non-payment of suit land rent by the plaintiffs / appellants for several years to the plaintiffs / plaintiffs / plaintiffs / plaintiffs for several years under the land ownership of the plaintiffs / defendants. Nonetheless, the defendants are still in the possession of the tenant under their rival's territorial power as the co-owners in the proprietary column of the Revenue Record Parties and the cultivation column showed the defendants / appellants as tenants. Is going The plaintiffs failed to establish their claim of negative possession of the land in the dispute under the defendants '/ appellants' land, the conclusions of the courts below, cannot be interfered with in the second appeal as a result of any The error could not be recovered. immigration advocates email from Khair Pur Mir lawyer