MUHAMMAD KALEEM versus ANWAR HUSSAIN
Civil Procedure Code Order XII of CPC Production, Document Validation and Return O XIII, R 2 & O XVIII, R, 2 Constitutional Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 78 Establishment of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Interim Order Petition for affirmative pain was allowed by the trial court during the trial when the defendant / defendant was allowed to have a controversial signature on the document rather than the signed signature of the applicant when the evidence of the plaintiff's evidence was sealed. But the trial court's order was not upheld in the evidence of the refusal. Leah was about a controversial signature on the court's swearing-in of evidence, in the circumstance, rightly suggesting that the expert's comparison of the signature of the dispute to reaching a fair closing order of the court below Would be helpful. The plaintiffs / respondents' request was fair and fair and because the use of the disk will not be interfered with by the High Court. It has a writ under the jurisdiction of the Constitution
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Ugoki lawyer