LIAQAT HAYAT versus THE STATE
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Evidence Defined The Recovery Of The Pistol From The Defendant Was Not Forbidden And thus was not included in the schedule of special hearings set by a special court established under the pressure of terrorist activities. ? Courts) Act, 1975, and the Special Court, therefore, had no jurisdiction to prosecute the accused, there was no evidence to prove that the room recovered from the Kalashnikov rifle's 80 bullets, either to the accused. Was allotted or in possession of or was found on the indictment of the accused, said the suspect was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Chacklala lawyer
