MESSRS PRINTPAC (PVT.) LIMITED versus RICE EXPORT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN LTD.
The plaintiff's evidence regarding her age at the time of puberty option of marriage settlement in the Schedule 5 and Schedule of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 was accepted because of the age of the defendant in the defendant's trial. Related evidence may be considered. One case when exercising the authority of the lower appellate court of adulthood did not commit any illegal act of deciding the same issue in order to ascertain its age at the same time as the plaintiff did not Was used during puberty which is a problem. Based on the evidence, the finding of fact was not demonstrated to be an illegal or lawful jurisdiction, finding the following court was retained in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
