ABDUL KHALEEM versus THE STATE
The prosecution's story in relation to the testimony of the defendant, defined in Section 12 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 377/34 and 302/34, did not inspire confidence even if the defendant had any duty to do with the accused. No, it was available to show that the victim had been in the company of the accused till the moment of the accused's presence, the accused had jointly disclosed knowledge of the body and jointly led to his recovery. And could not be used against him in the evidence of his inadmissibility. They did not have any evidence available to link the accused to a malicious offense that was committed with the deceased.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer
