ASIF ALIAS ACHHU versus THE STATE
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (4) Explanatory Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Definition of Evidence The diagnostic parade was not conducted fairly and in accordance with law and, therefore, in the eyes Could not provide help. The witnesses of the prosecution had greatly improved their positions during the trial. The eyewitnesses were closely associated with the complainant and did not appear above the board of conduct. The eye witnesses told the accused Not seen long enough to retain their distinctive features. Of the suspects in his memory, they only looked back when the incident had already happened, such witnesses could only hear the sound of gunfire and they did not claim to have seen the accused firing on the victim. What, they were merely witnesses of the occasion and their evidence did not affect the prosecution, therefore, failed to prove their case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the charges were bad in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Jamrud Road lawyer
