Find a Lawyer

ALL PAKISTAN RICE EXPORT CORPORATION WAREHOUSE AND CARRIERS EMPLOYEES\' UNION, KARACHI versus PAKISTAN WAREHOUSE CARRIERS WORKERS UNION, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) Respondent's trade union has claimed that the company is a collective bargaining agent and before this the trial court's agreement between the applicant union and the establishment was presented on this basis. It was the applicant union that was not registered with the Registrar Trade Unions. Certified as a Collective Bargaining Agent by the Registrar, there was no Lux Standing for signing petition Applicants for the approval of the ad interim order were also filed with the petitioners 'union challenging the petitioners' union. The petitioner's union had challenged the petition to hear the petition requested by. Under Article 38 (3A) of the Ordinance, 1969, the Tribunal passed an interim order relating to the jurisdiction of the automobile, claiming that the alleged settlement was made through the arbitration of the Federal Consultant and the matter was referred to the National Industrial Relations Commission ( NIRC). A logical conclusion as to the point in the dispute would be whether the collective bargaining agent (CBA) certificate issued to the applicant union by the NIRC was valid or invalid, no matter to the Labor Court for a decision on such dispute. No jurisdiction will be obtained, respondent's union contends that NIRC does not have the power to determine the applicant because the collective bargaining agent (CBA), when the defendant union had already settled. As the matter is still pending before the trial court, it cannot be said at this stage that when any evidence is available Was not that jurisdiction maam famous supreme court advocate from Lahore lawyer