Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN STEEL FABRICATING COMPANY LTD. versus MUHAMMAD YASIN

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 18), Termination of Services of Sections Ozs 1 and 12 (3) Plaintiff's services were terminated by the Security Guard at Appellant Company. The temporary job in which he was working was completed. The respondent was periodically appointed as a security guard and claimed to have been employed on a regular basis while working for the benefit of permanent employees. Rights were not granted. The working person shows that he was first appointed on temporary basis on 19 7 1984 to 15 10, the appellant's witness admitted that the attendant registrar was permanently employed on a regular basis from 19 7 1984 to 30 4 Employed until 1985. At that time there was no security guard who was not made permanent because after his appointment the medical worker was also issued a Medical CE certi ?? cation that was issued only to those employees who were employed as permanent employees. Joined the duty from the respondents' appointment letters do not appear to be dubious nor show any disruption to the service, in view of the evidence of the appellant's testimony and documentary evidence from both parties, as a permanent worker Labor Court respondent's holding was unimaginable and termination of service was not sustainable solicitors from Mandra lawyer