KHAIR MUHAMMAD versus MANAGER, INDUS FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&34 Resignation Appellants who employed as respondents' mill, formed trade unions and were appointed officers, Appellant was not allowed to resume duty on this basis. That he had resigned from his job. Defendant's argument was that the appellants had resigned and that they had received their due in a complete and final settlement, but the appellants denied their signatures on the petition for resignation. It was not enough to prove the fact that the appellants had signed him in the presence, the appellants had resigned from the job, the appellant was reinstated with full back benefits.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
