Find a Lawyer

ISRARUL HAQUE versus MIDWAY HOUSE (PVT.) LIMITED

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A dismissed appellant, an employee and a trustee and a member of the defendant's company were charged with two misconduct acts by a union member. That is, quarreling with an officer and admitting the abusive behavior in relation to a matter to which he had absolutely no concern was investigated against the inquiry, and as a result the appellant was dismissed from his job. As a trustee and member in the capacity, the Works Council inquired about the funds from the administration and for this reason he faced the displeasure of the general manager and finance member who had falsely implicated him in the case. The decision was taken by the management neither the general manager, nor the finance manager nor the inquiry officer, whether the defendant's witness had shown that he was unaware of every fact laid before him or not. Whether or not the witness wrote a letter to the general manager and the finance manager. The inquiry also denied Appellant's suggestion to be present in the inquiry. The Yury officer, in his report, commented on the appellant's past conduct which was not subject to the charge sheet, which stated that the letter of termination of the services of the appellant stated It has been noted that the administration has kept records of its past records which indicate that it was influenced by the inquiry officer's inquiries. The report was laid, the investigations in this case were not fair and it was stated that the order of dismissal of the appellant sanctioned on the basis of this report was not sustainable and it was set aside and the appellant was given fifty per cent. law firms from Thul lawyer