Find a Lawyer

UNITED BANK LIMITED, HYDERABAD versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR ARAIN

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1908), Sections Oz 12 and 15 The dismissal of the appellant who worked with the respondent mill was allegedly done by the plaintiff. Dismissed on grounds. Not satisfied that no complaint was filed by the appellant and that he had submitted his resignation. Labor Court has stated that the appellant was not a worker. In response to his request, the petitioner was rejected. No job description provided and the appellant's nature of work. It was possible for both parties to accept the opinion in favor of the worker and the Labor Court found that the appellant had not been appointed an employee, on respondent's request for notice of the notice allegedly presented by the appellant to the employee. I, it happened that it was signed by the appellant but in the cross examination the appellant accepted that he did not know how to sign but then he insisted that he sign the complaint notice. Were the Labor Court to conclude that the said notice could not be called a proper notice, the Tribunal vacated the Appellant It was asked to sign it before and upon the request of the Complaint resemblance to the signature of the sample as well as on the affidavit and complaint notice in the evidence, the appropriate, reasonable complaint notice was presented to the employer and the circumstances of the Labor Court On the question of whether the appellant had resigned from the job itself, the evidence on record did not support the dispute presented by the parties, but was not sustainable. best law firm from Khushab lawyer