ABDUL RASHID MALIK versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Application of Complaint Legal Responsibility of the Court When a complaint was filed by an employee, the Labor Court would be subject to the legal facts of the case. Look at all the facts and approve as such. The complaint that was brought before it would be considered appropriate and appropriate in the matter of deciding and determining it, hence the relation between the laborer and the employer is, therefore, the condition that he or she should contact the laborer. Have the legal authority to decide your complaint. Under Section 25A, the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, no tribunal of limited jurisdiction could grant itself jurisdiction, in the presence of facts about the existence of which jurisdiction depended where the labor appellate tribunal was concerned Failure to provide any information or whether the applicant was a laborer, he had no jurisdiction to decide the appeal on the merits order of Labhu so the appellate tribunal was accused of canceling only on that basis, the Labor Appellate. After giving the tribunal certain information about the matter, the decision to appeal A reconsideration was made as to whether the applicants were employees within the meaning of the relevant rules. Only then will the Labor Appellate Court examine the merits of the case and not
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
