Find a Lawyer

JAMILUR REHMAN QURESHI versus ABDUL QAYYUM

Section 17 (4) (b) (ii) and (iii) of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963, the landlord's personal necessity, filed a lawsuit against the tenant because he retired from active service in the Pakistan Army. And had no other occupation and he needed a controversial premises to start his own business, which was resisted by the applicants, primarily by the request that the landlord serve. I am present and in dispute another shop was closed which was not used. The landlord who admittedly retired from the military and served in the touring corporation after his retirement is the fact that the landlord was employed by the military during his retirement when he retired. Unless it is shown that they have no business, no such evidence was presented on record by the tenant intending to start the business, the landlord proved his case that the fact is the landlord Had found another shop, not contradicted by L.L. Both of the shops want to use this order to launch their proposed business inspections offered by the roller, in which the landlord was not sure about the nature of the business in which he wants to be disputed. Not submitted because the landlord had no obligation to disclose the nature of his business, either in the eviction request or in the affidavit that the landlord had entered into a dispute advocates from Issa Khel lawyer