Find a Lawyer

MOHAMED NASIR FAROOQI versus ZUBAIDA

Section 17 (9) of the Cantonment Rent Registration Act, 1963, striking a defense tenant who was filing rent with another rent controller, was directed by the rent controller, Cantonment, to withdraw the rent submitted by him. And fails to submit the rent controller cantonment to the tenant. According to the rental controller's instructions, the tenant's cantonment defense removed the tenant without hearing the notice from the court accountant, which indicates that the tenant was temporarily in the process of ordering the rent. Failed to submit rent on terms. Temporarily under the Rent Order, he filed an application before the Rent Controller where he was already collecting rent, withdrawing the rent from it and submitting it to the Rent Controller, before the Rent Controller. The tenant's request was directed by the tenant prior to the hearing. The order to withhold the tenant's defense, whether imposed by the tenant or not, can only be certified after providing the opportunity for the tenant to explain the circumstances for non-compliance of the rental order when The tenant had not heard his defense before, the tenant controller did not follow the proper procedure; Default when it was not determined whether the default is intentional or not, giving the tenant the opportunity to explain the situation. famous high court advocate from Chowk Azam lawyer