AURANGZEB versus STATE
Haram (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Evidence Defined The two appellants charged were son and mother, InterC, on two separate occasions when police received information related to detectives charged with possessing 95 grams and 60 grams of heroin respectively. Had requested. Both cases were common to both witnesses, who were police officers, not affiliated with any public, although the recovery had an impact on the heart of the city and many people completed proceedings in one case and raided another case. Had gathered evidence about. Controversy over material was found in evidence that the mother (age 60), son and daughter and another son were summoned by the police in various cases, the parcel was detained four days without explanation. Kept, the prosecution's story was mixed with the impossible and the defense story. The police were searching for the suspect's sister in his house the day before, protesting against what he was protesting, possibly an injunction was ordered.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Kalam lawyer