GHULAM RASOOL ALIAS WAKIL versus STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Evidence of the Detective's Detective A raid took place around 3pm near a hotel and busy place, and allegedly yielded 16kg of opium from the suspect, Neither a hotel staff member nor anyone else. The customer was involved in the operation There was no clear explanation for not being associated with any independent witnesses, a self-investigation officer and a stock witness who was resident about 12 miles away from the incident and who was believed to be in the spinning mills. I did not believe the evidence of both witnesses appearing on duty at the relevant time was cross-examined between the accused and the police at the Court One police station and three posts of the Narcotic Control Board were present and they were not reported. The authority to prosecute the trial or trial associated with the opioid recovery was given and the accused I set aside the sentence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Daharki lawyer