SINDH SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, HYDERABAD versus MUHAMMAD KHALID ANSARI
Section 1 (4) Factories Act (XXV of 1934), Sections 2 (h) and 2 (j) of the Sindh Small Industries and Handicrafts Corporation Service Rules, 1978 employed a rehabilitation worker as a permanent assistant in a mechanized training center. , No evidence exists to show. That there were more than ten workers operating or operating any manufacturing center at this training center, not in the category of workers described in the Factories Act (XXV), Employee Factories Act, 1934 will come. (1934), Sections 2 (h) and 2 (j) Sindh Small Industries and Handicrafts Corporation Service Rules, 1978 There is no evidence that the maintenance worker was employed as a permanent assistant in the mechanized training center. That more than ten workers were working, said that under the training center or any manufacturing process center, the employees mentioned in the Factories Act, 1934 would not fall into the worker category.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
