Find a Lawyer

JALILUR REHMAN versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION

Appellant's four complaints against the Law Reform Ordinance 1972 Section 3 Intro-Court Appeal Corporation were that the phones installed at his residence were not converted to a new number. After demanding the note, a telephone connection was not provided, and proper telephone clearances and fixed charges were paid. The divisional engineer did not comply with the general manager's orders instructing him to move the appellant's residence closer to the DP. And directing the complainant to issue a receipt for filing a complaint if the telephone is not working. The first applicant's two complaints were thwarted as the old number was changed to the new number and the defendant has raised the DP's general manager to comply with the change orders. It was technically possible that the court order was to receive the line fare within a fortnight of the day from which the original connection was provided to the appellant and not from the date of approval because of public importance, the defendant. It was a moral and legal obligation to maintain a register for the registration of complaints and the receipt of complaints in public offices. advocate from Mithi lawyer