Find a Lawyer

SAHIB KHAN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 307/34 Testimony of Evidence The evidence of the police party members and the conscience was of little importance as no identification tests were conducted by the witnesses nor did they provide any explanation of the accused in their statements. According to the prosecutor's son, the victim, who was presented as a prosecution witness, was not present at the time of the incident. The witness did not even tell the court that he was at the time of the alleged encounter between police and the accused Was present, the evidence of such a witness was in no way beneficial to the accused. He said that his eyes were closed and he could not see whether the accused had fired at the police or not. Victim also did not give details of the accused and the identification test was about 10 months and 10 days long. The delay was made after which no evidence was taken from anyone. No explanation was given by the prosecution for such a delay in conducting the second quarter identification parade prosecution, thus, the culprits were sentenced and sentenced to prove their case against the suspects who failed beyond reasonable doubt. And he was acquitted of the charge online advocate from Kohat lawyer