Find a Lawyer

CRESCENT GARMENTS INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED versus SHAMIM BANO

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Withdrawal from employment For more than ten days, the worker was accused of missing absent notice and was found guilty of domestic investigations and dismissed. had gone. The worker alleged that he was ill and had received a message about it. Through a co-worker, the employer suffered from the illness, but later forgot to inform the employer, and when she came back to resume duty, she was stopped and after that she did not come to the worker again nor did she. Neither the complainant's notice nor his complaint's request stated that he was a gatekeeper, alleging that the inquiry officer did not accept his medical certificate, nor did he record his statements nor his witnesses. What. Upon review of the witnesses' statement on the record, it is clear that the worker had taken his stand before the inquiry officer and there was a contradictory worker in his complaint. The Inquiry Officer did not present any testimony to prove his illness that the worker was absent based on facts; it was neither illegal nor proved to be an inappropriate worker's misconduct and without notice and permission. He was absent for more than ten days and was given a legal sentence in a domestic investigation that he found guilty, which he found to be fair and reasonable. An order restoring a labor court restoration worker was approved on false pretext of evidence which was dismissed as non-arranged pakistani advocates Wazirabad lawyer