ALLAH DITTA versus GHULAM RASOOL SHAH
Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, Section 22, Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), Section 7 (vi) Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII, R 11. In determining the pre-arrest case, the first order of the court should be to obtain a statement of the net profit prepared by the authorities related to the plaintiffs and bring them to the record on a certain date as well as to the revenue authorities. Send instructions for doing the job. The order was complied with, the court should carefully examine the net profit statement prepared and, if there were any defects, then send it back to the relevant revenue authorities for correction, such a correction of the error. Proper diagnosis should be made after or if there was no defect. If the court fees and the plaintiff were asked to make the same payment by a certain date, the matter would have been settled if the plaintiff had complied with the order, but if he had not complied with the order nor had he brought any case. ? Extension of time, then, can only be dismissed by the plaintiff and it was stated that the matter has not been acted upon and in the absence of any positive economic mismanagement or bad faith or gross negligence by the plaintiff, The case cannot be dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Tank lawyer