KHUDA BUX versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 190 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), ss 336, 448 and 148 and 149 constitutional jurisdiction of the accused found innocent by the police during criminal investigations. Was filed against. Section 9090, to seek CCP defendants to appear before a magistrate who was dismissed by the complainant on his second request under J190, CRPC re-examined by the trial court. This time, and the defendants were summoned, the trial court's order was upset by the Additional Sessions Judge, the conclusion of the police was based on appropriate content and the exercise of the jurisdiction to modify it was upheld by the reviewing court against the facts and law. Had the exclusive jurisdiction to decide on a proper definition and to seek the police open to any serious legal objection There was no magistrate. Review his own first order, reviewing Additional C's refusal to seek defendants, order sferences judges were not prone to any jurisdictional error or unlawful patent, seeking no interference with the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction Because the application was dismissed under circumstances because it was devoid of any legal power.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Hub Chowki lawyer