Find a Lawyer

PIR MUHAMMAD versus SULEMAN GLASS WORKS, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Shops & Establishment Ordinance (VIII Of 1969) West Pakistan Industrial And Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Sections Oz 12 And 15 Termination Of Appellant Services Without Order. ????? In writing and without payment of salary for which the appellant submitted a notice of complaint, it was resisted by the employees to request the appellant's complaint that he was registered under the Shops and Establishment Ordinance, 1969. And as such they were not included in the Standing Order Ordinance, 1968. The employer employed more than fifty workers but did not present evidence in support of his claim The appellant requested that one of his witnesses was prevented from giving evidence by the respondent who presented the oral version that he had Only less than twenty workers were employed. The proof of both parties is equally balanced, the burden of registering / preparing records is due to the appointment of workers and their presence has been transferred to the employer so they do not maintain this record. He could maintain no record, though the record was restored by the West Pakistan Shops and Establishment Rules, 1969. Was a mandatory supply of rules and did not maintain such records. It was a criminal offense, because the record was a mandatory supply of restitution rules that the employer failed to maintain, so legal action could be taken against him and his oral evidence that did not maintain the record was not accepted. Could be because the appellant was against it, however, the initial burden was excluded by saying that famous lower court advocate from Kharan lawyer