Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus THE STATE

Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosives Act 1908, the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Sections 8, 9 and 13 of the Pressure on Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 19/75), Section 7 Evidence , Were found in possession of the defendant's testimony. Two hand grenades and five cartridges of different sacks were presented with no expert evidence to prove that the hand grenades were in the works and could have exploded, witnessing a recovery was unusual and of interest because the village I belonged to a rival group and heard testimony from other witnesses about the recovery. The investigating officer was not sufficient to base the accused's conviction because he wanted to stabilize it, the provisions of the Explosive Substances Act case, thus were not attracted to the punishment and the circumstances were punished. law firms from Choppar Hatta lawyer