ISHRAT LQBAL SIDDIQUE versus MANAGER, MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD .
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 (3) Termination of Services Appellant was working as a warehouse keeper in the warehouse, which was handled by the employer on the basis that the employer appealed. He is an employee of various parties whose goods were periodically pledged to various commercial concerns with the bank. Although the property is still subject to commercial concerns, the possession of the goods remains with the bank which was responsible for the custody of the goods and It is entitled to recover the costs incurred by the bank in the safe delivery of such goods. Owners Bank hired appellants to work as godown keepers and paid salaries, though it recovered from commercial concerns, would be considered as employees by Appellant Bank and they would be considered as standby 5 0 12 (3). Shall be considered to receive the status of temporary employees. Ordinance Ordinance, 1968, and their services could not be terminated without a temporary staffing service, without a written notice and without giving clear reasons for termination of such services, the order of annulment was declared illegal and unenforceable. Was given and placed aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer