Find a Lawyer

H. ABDUL RAUF KHAN versus PAKISTAN TOBACCO CO. LTD.

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Rehabilitation Appeal Worker was found guilty of domestic theft and dismissed by the Labor Court in that inquiry. Not investigated. The allegation of theft was done fairly and implicitly because there is some contradiction in the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses and ordering the worker to be restored to no avail was denied to the worker by providing copies of the witness statements in the initial investigation. And copies of the witness statements recorded by the Inquiry Officer were also denied. Inquiring officer to give copies of witnesses' first statements to the worker, in fact he was disabled and deprived the proper scrutiny of witnesses to expose contradictions, if any, in his statements to the worker himself. It missed the full scope of its principles. The worker was not approved to replace the investigating officer who violated the natural justice request, although there is no evidence to show that the worker intends to delay the process through such a request. , The order passed on the basis of such inquiry was not enforceable. With the observation that if the administration, if they wish, may inquire into the same charge sheet by some inquiry officer in accordance with the principles and principles of natural justice in charge, in case of fresh inquiry, in case of inquiry, I advocates from Mandra lawyer