NOOR HAMEED SHAH versus NATIONAL PARTICLE BOARD (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 and 15 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25, alleges the dismissal of service from the absence of employees for more than ten days without leave Gone, though, the worker sent a vacation request from his father saying the worker was found guilty of a domestic investigation and was dismissed from his job. Before leaving the worker, his leave was not approved, stating that the employer had to apply in practice and then proceed. On leave, the worker admitted in cross-examination that he had no evidence to submit the application or that the inquiry officer had acted in a biased manner and did not give the appellant the opportunity to examine the administration's testimony or Present your defense testimony, the appellant's signature was in the inquiry proceedings. There was nothing in the worker and the record to indicate that he had ever made a pledge to be absent from the worker's duty due to inquiries regarding the dismissal order and procedures. The process is disorderly for which any convicted worker in clause (2) of section 15 (2) can be punished. He was also victimized by trade union activities, not even proved by the record
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
