SYED AFSAR AHMAD versus THE STATE
The definitions of Articles 9 and 13 (e) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 contained serious contradictions, and the complainant as well as the number of advisers were present when, according to the complainant, he had advised the advisers on the route before arriving. Was picked up from where the suspects were arrested. When they were picked up by the police to act as advisers, the suspects were already with the police. They were students who had been in custody for more than 10 months. The prosecution argued against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Failed to prove the case, while the court took advantage. Doubt the suspect, put their sentence aside and they were acquitted of the charge
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Pir Mahal lawyer
