Find a Lawyer

HAZRAT SHAH versus MUHAMMAD HANIF

Sections 2 (a) and 14 Landlord tried to evict a tenant in a dispute over his personal use of running a hospital on a commercial and charitable basis, claiming the 61-year-old. Where the disputed premises were located and six shops located on the lower floor of the building were owned by the landlord who owned a building in the area, to take advantage of section (1) of section 14 (1) of the ordinance. Was not entitled Under section 14 (2) of section 14 (2) of the Ordinance 1979, the landlord, who was in the larger part of the building, could not find the bar contained in section (2) of part of the building for the purpose of the bar. This part of the tenant's eviction was not enough to occupy the house and was not fit to meet his needs. (2) The landlord's confession obtained was necessary for the purpose of operating the cover \ a hospital, which he had a priori desire and should not be denied that it was only because of his technical abilities. The disclaimer was in favor. The fact is that sentimentality had no place in a decision that should have been based on facts that were presented by the parties in evidence, oral or documentary film, and the facts of this particular case were recorded in accordance with applicable law. immigration advocates from Chak Jhumra lawyer