MEHR KHAN versus THE STATE
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Explosives Related Act (VII of 1908), Section 4 (b) Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Schedule [as Pressure on Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) has been amended) (Amendment) Act (V of 1990)] The jurisdiction of the Special Court accused of possessing illegal Kalashnikov by a special court and the handgun defendant sentenced by the Special Court Was challenged on the basis that in that date when he was allegedly convicted, the special court has no authority to accuse him because On the basis of this ordinance, the court sought to expire which was not presented to Parliament for approval. The accused's hearing was canceled in view of the fact that the offense was confessed to the date of the offense. That's when the accused did. He said that the ordinance is highly enforceable even though the expiry date for non-submission to the parliament for its approval was expired, followed by the expiry of the ordinance, which will not affect the bad. The deviation of the court which he once obtained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Buchay Key lawyer