Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus THE STATE

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2), the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the currency notes marked section 161, making the defaulted money, were admittedly recovered from the pocket of the accused by the raiding magistrate, capable of Could not explain the comprehension. At the time of the raid, neither the raiding magistrate had actually noticed the currency note marked between the complainant and the accused at the trial, but due to the distance, the magistrate could not hear their conversation, the prosecution's case. Was fully supported by independent witnesses, who had no rivalry or corruption against the accused. Accused of making false accusations against Pila, who was accused in the case at the behest of another public official, it proved unfounded that the raiding magistrate erred in listening to the conversation between the complainant and the accused. Have encountered The prosecution's case was stopped by the court to hear the complaint, at the relevant time, by the magistrate, internally and the accused, neither the law nor the procedure required. immigration advocates phone number from Qazi Ahmed lawyer