Find a Lawyer

BARKAT ALI versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 202020 // 68 / / evidence evidence / 10 / / 10/1099 The definition of evidence was that they were engaged in selling false fertilizers to farmers, the statements of members of the raiding party comprising senior officers, the whole. It has been proven that the accused was in charge of the sale. The false fertilizer prosecution witness, the farmer, said he had purchased the so-called fertilizer from the accused, and when it was applied to the ground, it proved to be so fake and harmful that the wheat seed had not spread to any anal suspects. He did not issue a receipt. Was present to refute the testimony which was a free, unwanted and straightforward witness case against the defendant in its entirety, he was properly convicted under Section 420, PPC, In the absence of any evidence, what was the role played by the co-accused in the crime? , The co-accused was acquitted of what documents the accused had forged and was tortured with no one, anywhere knowing that in an offense made under section 686868/1 471, P.P. G was convicted or convicted of the offenses under section 6868/11, PPC was set aside for this, while the punishment of the accused was retained under Section 202020, P: PC. jobs for fresh advocates from Chak Jhumra lawyer