Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus ABDULLAH

SS 302/34 and 304, Part I Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 417 Appeal against the evil motive presented by the complaining party proved credible and the trial court collected evidence on non-preferential grounds. Rejected for no significant reason. Proof of pistol was recovered by the accused from the premises of the incident and the trial court erroneously excluded the evidence due to misrepresentation and misrepresentation of evidence, the accused's confession was established on the occasion of the accused's confession. The injury was sustained by the injuries and the FIR, which was filed by him immediately, confirmed the complainant's evidence through the said controversial findings and not only the Ballistic Express report which was in positive defense evidence. One was thought, but also decent, unnatural, and unreliable. Even the medical evidence was denied. Thus, the prosecutor proved his case against the accused beyond reasoning. It is suspected that the trial-related cases were dismissed, however, The accused was, however, convicted under Section 304, Part I, PPC, because the incident occurred suddenly in a hotel with no conspiracy and did not repeat the shot, the accused was sentenced. ? For up to seven years - I 382 B, CR PC RI with fine and advantage criminal advocate from Sanghi lawyer