Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 9439/999 ????? The testimony of the accused was that he burned the accused seat bus with the help of the accused and set it on fire while he was standing at the bus stand. The owner of the bus, who refused to pay the placeholder pay to the accused who allegedly burned the bus of another owner in similar circumstances who alleged that the accused had already Another owner's bus was burnt due to which there was no 'tax space'. There is no evidence in this regard as to the nature of the complainant's statement, such as the former's conduct, which was not sufficient to prove the complainant's allegation against the defendant that he did not pay the claim of the complainant merely by paying the tax What was supported by the testimony of only one prosecutor, otherwise the nut would have affected confidence if the threat posed by the complainant was accepted by the complainant even then it was not enough to stop the accused from abusing, Because the prosecution failed to establish a direct or indirect relationship with the defendants, who were the main perpetrators of the crime. In this way, the allegations of impunity were not proved against the accused, so beyond any reasonable doubt it was proved by the prosecution that the conviction and sentence of the accused was set aside and acquitted. All the charges against him top advocate from Feroz Walla lawyer