Find a Lawyer

GU17AR HUSSAIN SHAH versus PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PVT.) LIMITED

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI VI 1968), Termination of Section O12 (3) Services Appellant's services were terminated against the same position in which he was recruited. had gone. In the cross examination, the appellant himself admitted that the post of telephone technician had been terminated and that no person was employed after his service was terminated. The employer was not charged with any financial force in the notice of complaint, nothing was available to show that a person was a junior while the appellant was retained as a telephone technician or telephone operator. The appellant's case was a dismissal case whose removal order was in accordance with the requirements of Order 12 (3), as it has specifically indicated in writing. In exchange for reasons for termination of service and also paid thirty days' salary, he was retained in the circumstances. inheritance advocates near Ghazi lawyer