ABDUL LATIF KHAN versus DHANJISHAW BAHRANJI GHADIALLY
The Special Relief Act, 1877, sued the Department for the collection of the amount owed by the parties, that according to the oath executed by the parties for the construction of the bulletins, the work done by the plaintiff also included the construction of the controversial bulletin. The costs were claimed by the plaintiff for. The oral evidence and the documentary evidence presented by the plaintiff on the claim were inconsistent and the defendant's evidence presented by the plaintiff did not encourage any credibility as the plaintiff's evidence was proved by the plaintiff and his testimony was presented to the plaintiff. Are in recovery case after being claimed. An Accordion of Money was ordered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
