SAFFAR versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 561 Sindh Crimes Control Act (IV of 1975), section 4/14 to terminate the report of the action filed by the Station House Officer on which the sub-divisional magistrate acknowledged it. What, it turns out that allegations have been made against them. The accused were of a modest nature and were not given any examples of any alleged action taken against the accused. No doubt, three cases were mentioned in which the accused was allegedly involved. But the Section H report showed that the accused was only cheated. The cases said, but in none of them was he found guilty when he did not act in accordance with the provisions of Act IV of 1975, without the use of mechanics and mind, his order could not be sustained. , Accordingly, the action was halted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Sara e Naurang lawyer