IQBAL GHAFOOR ENGINEERING WORKS versus GHAFOOR BEGUM SOOFI
Revision on the orders of the courts below the Civil Procedure Code Order XVII OXVII, R3 and Section 115 of the CPC adjustments indicated that the plaintiffs / applicants whose evidence was closed and the evidence on non-submission. Excluded, they were given numerous opportunities to present their evidence but failed to take advantage of the provisions of the same sentence under OXVII, R3, CPC, were indeed not strictly enforced. Should have been, but justice should be in favor of both parties, which may be in favor of one party. Contrary to the orders of the courts, the other discretion is hard to come by regarding the close evidence of the applicants using the appellant's two evidence properly, but their circumstances were not favorable.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
