Find a Lawyer

AHMED DIN versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ

Appeals against the dismissal of the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff unanimous decision on the statement of advice of the CPC recognized agents and applicants Civil Procedure Code Order III, R4 and OXXIII, R3 But a decision was made in their favor. The parties suggest that the parties had come to an agreement and that the defendants had recognized the pre-emptor's pre-emptive right to self-determination and that the defendants had no objection if the decree was passed in favor of the plaintiff. Was, on an appeal filed by any of the defendants / appellants, the decision of consent and the appellate court approved by the trial court was set aside and a remand of the case was obtained, stating that That the defendant / appellant was not personally present in the court at the time the statement was made by his counsel. The plaintiff / appellant's lawyer had full authority to act on behalf of his client and could make a compromise that could be binding on his client as the terms of the lawyer's name were executed by the defendant in favor of his court. Is. The nsel granted it the full authority, so that under the circumstances the appellate court was clearly in error in deciding the decree of consent which would not have been otherwise. immigration advocate from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer